The America that we want back
Today, in Barcelona, I spoke to the Direct and Interactive Marketing Global Forum about the future of advertising. But after my speech, all anyone wanted to talk about was Obama and America. The Spaniards all had the same question. It was about the United States. They all wanted to know about the future of America. They wanted to know if Obama could save America.
Over a tapas lunch, one guy, a very senior Catalan marketing executive, confided in me. "The America we all know, the America of innovation, the America that continually reinvents itself, " he asked with a childish hopefulness. "Is that America dead? Can Obama reinvent America?"
Thomas Friedman had the same sorts of conversations in Cairo last week. Like the people I met in Barcelona today, Friedman's Egyptian friends have a "hunger" for the "idea of America." In "Obama on the Nile", Friedman explains today in the New York Times that it's the Emersonian idea of America as the future which most inspires the rest of the world:
In his history of 19th-century America, “What Hath God Wrought,” Daniel Walker Howe quotes Ralph Waldo Emerson as telling a meeting of the Mercantile Library Association in 1844 that “America is the country of the future. It is a country of beginnings, of projects, of vast designs and expectations.”
The mistake, I fear, is to expect too much of Obama. The one area most resistant to change in America is politics. Change, real change, in America is going to come through business, technology and education. That's where we have to look for Emerson's beginnings, projects, vast designs and expectations. But the America political system has become so ossified that it will take more than a sweet talking lawyer to transform government into the core engine of American innovation.
So Obama, who should easily defeat McCain in November, will become no more than a symbol of American reinvention in the early 21st century. We've got to look elsewhere to glimpse the future of America. Experiments in social capitalism. The universities. The green revolution. The entertainment industries. Biotechnology and nanotechnology. Even, dare I say it, the Internet.





















Andrew, this deserved more than the space of a comment; so I invite you and your readers to check out:
http://therehearsalstudio.blogspot.com/2008/06/our-greatest-loss-loss-of-balance.html
Posted by: Stephen Smoliar | Friday, 13 June 2008 at 09:51 AM
Well, Andrew, you're right.
In fact, the most important people in America are not John McCain or Barack Obama -- it is Steve Jobs, Sergey Brin. It is folks like Ray Kurzweil, and the brains behind Sirtis.
It is not surprising that the Europeans would be so eager to see Obama as some sort of savior. They view politicans a people who can somehow really effect their lives for the good. How naive. For as George Bush was never as bad as they think, so Obama will never be as good. In fact, he's in the end a simple slut politician, demagoging for votes and engaging in smears of one sort or another. He knows nothing of economics and business. All he knows about is vote getting.
Posted by: Karl K | Saturday, 14 June 2008 at 08:00 PM